Stop buying tools to fix process problems

Here’s the claim: most tool purchases in revenue operations are attempts to fix a process problem with a product, and they don’t work — they just make the broken process run faster. If your handoff leaks, a better tool leaks at higher throughput. The software was never the constraint.

Why the reflex is so strong

Buying feels like doing something. There’s a demo, a business case, a rollout, a training session — visible progress you can point to in a board update. Fixing a process is the opposite: it’s slow, it’s political, and there’s nothing to show but a slightly less broken handoff. Faced with a number that’s missing, “let’s evaluate a tool” is simply more comfortable than “let’s admit our qualification definition is a mess”.

Vendors are happy to reinforce it. Every tool is positioned as the answer to a symptom you’re feeling, and it’s genuinely easier to believe the missing capability is external than to look hard at your own process.

What actually breaks

Run through the common leaks: leads routed to no one, a qualification bar two teams grade differently, follow-up that depends on the individual rep, reporting nobody trusts. None of those is a missing feature. Each is a decision that wasn’t made or an agreement that isn’t enforced. Drop a new tool on top and you’ve automated the same broken decision — often adding a fresh integration boundary to leak through.

Consider a team that bought an attribution platform to settle which channels worked, then kept arguing about channels for another two quarters — because the real problem was that source data broke at the handoff, and the shiny new platform inherited exactly the same broken input.

The honest exception

Sometimes the tool is the constraint. If you’re routing leads by hand on a spreadsheet, the manual step genuinely is the bottleneck — buy the thing. The test is simple: can you make the process work manually, even clumsily? If yes, fix and prove the process first, then buy to scale it. If the process doesn’t work by hand, no tool will save it.

What to do before you sign

Map the handoff. Follow one lead end to end and mark where it leaks. If the leak is a missing capability, buy. If it’s a broken agreement — and it usually is — no purchase order fixes that.

Related reading

See you don’t have a tooling problem, you have a handoff problem and RevOps isn’t a tool you buy.

Not sure which yours is? Book a health check.

One of a growing set of field notes from ohuruogu.com — practical RevOps and marketing-ops insights drawn from the systems I run, not theory. Browse the Insights hub · About the practice · Connect on LinkedIn

Recognise this in your own pipeline?

The Pipeline Leak Audit finds where qualified demand stalls between marketing and sales — and gives you a costed, prioritised fix plan in three weeks.